1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Colt | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 2 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2489 mm |