1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Colt | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Colt | 3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2639 mm |
