1989 Dodge Colt vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-05 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Colt. (97 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05 should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-05 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1989 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-05 (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-05 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Colt | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Colt | CX-05 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
