1989 Dodge Daytona vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1989 Dodge Daytona is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Daytona (141 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Daytona weights approximately 179 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Dodge Daytona (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Dodge Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Daytona | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Daytona | 2000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91.1 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |