1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 1966 Holden EH
To start off, 1989 Dodge Lancer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 15 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Lancer | 1966 Holden EH | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Lancer | EH |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
