1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 1966 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1989 Dodge Lancer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Lancer (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 475 kg more than 1966 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Lancer | 1966 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Lancer | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2140 mm |
