1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1989 Dodge Lancer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 286 kg more than 1989 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Lancer | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Lancer | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1486 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |
