1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 520 kg more than 1989 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Lancer | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Lancer | E |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |