1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 5,513 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 397 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 759 kg more than 1989 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Dodge Lancer | 2004 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Lancer | SL |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 493 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1959 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |
