1989 Dodge Lancer vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XF weights approximately 645 kg more than 1989 Dodge Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Lancer | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Lancer | XF |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2908 mm |