1989 Dodge Shadow vs. 1966 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1989 Dodge Shadow is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Falcon (106 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Shadow. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Shadow. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 56 kg more than 1966 Ford Falcon.
Because 1966 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Dodge Shadow | 1966 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Shadow | Falcon |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 56 L |