1989 Dodge Shadow vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Shadow would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Shadow (175 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Shadow should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Shadow weights approximately 548 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Shadow, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Dodge Shadow (278 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1989 Dodge Shadow will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: