1989 Ferrari F40 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1989 Ferrari F40 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,936 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Ferrari F40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ferrari F40 (640 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 536 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ferrari F40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ferrari F40 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ferrari | Lotus |
| Model | F40 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2936 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 640 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |
