1989 Ferrari F40 vs. 1975 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1989 Ferrari F40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,936 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Ferrari F40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ferrari F40 (640 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 540 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ferrari F40 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ferrari F40 weights approximately 413 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ferrari F40 (721 Nm) has 585 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (136 Nm). This means 1989 Ferrari F40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ferrari F40 | 1975 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Ferrari | Mazda |
| Model | F40 | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2936 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 640 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 721 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1263 kg | 850 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 65 L |
