1989 Ferrari F40 vs. 1996 Renault Megane

To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ferrari F40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ferrari F40 would be higher. At 2,936 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Ferrari F40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ferrari F40 (640 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 527 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (113 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ferrari F40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ferrari F40 weights approximately 143 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1989 Ferrari F40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ferrari F40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ferrari F40 (721 Nm) has 553 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (168 Nm). This means 1989 Ferrari F40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: