1989 Ferrari F40 vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ferrari F40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ferrari F40 would be higher. At 2,936 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Ferrari F40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ferrari F40 (640 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 532 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForFour. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ferrari F40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ferrari F40 weights approximately 288 kg more than 2000 Smart ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ferrari F40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ferrari F40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ferrari F40 | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Ferrari | Smart |
| Model | F40 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2936 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 640 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1263 kg | 975 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 47 L |
