1989 Fiat Croma vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1989 Fiat Croma is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 100 kg more than 1989 Fiat Croma.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Fiat Croma | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Crestline |
Year Released | 1989 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2940 mm |