1989 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1989 Fiat Croma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Fiat Croma (116 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Fiat Croma weights approximately 460 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Fiat Croma (245 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Fiat Croma | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Croma | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2360 mm |