1989 Fiat Vivace vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1989 Fiat Vivace is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1989 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 1989 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 220 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1989 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Fiat Vivace | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Vivace | 220 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2610 mm |