1989 Ford Aerostar vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1989 Ford Aerostar is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 480 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Aerostar | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Aerostar | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2540 mm |
