1989 Ford Aerostar vs. 1981 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Ford Aerostar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 365 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Aerostar | 1981 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Aerostar | 626 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |