1989 Ford Aerostar vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 150 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1989 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Aerostar | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Aerostar | AA-X |
Year Released | 1989 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1260 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2530 mm |