1989 Ford Aerostar vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1989 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Aerostar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Aerostar | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Aerostar | XF |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2908 mm |
