1989 Ford Corsair vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Ford Corsair. (129 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Corsair.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Corsair. (189 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Corsair | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Corsair | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2389 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 189 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |