1989 Ford Fairlane vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 1989 Ford Fairlane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Fairlane (186 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 910 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Fairlane | 1968 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | 4 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3949 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2410 mm |
