1989 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Fairlane (186 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1989 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Fairlane | TL |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3949 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2840 mm |
