1989 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Honda Passport
To start off, 2002 Honda Passport is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Passport (190 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1989 Ford Fairlane. (186 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Passport should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1989 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Fairlane (338 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Honda Passport | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Fairlane | Passport |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3949 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 256 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2710 mm |
