1989 Ford Granada vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,292 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1989 Ford Granada. (125 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1989 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (214 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Granada. (174 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Granada | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Granada | 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 64 L |