1989 Ford Granada vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Granada would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Granada (125 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Granada weights approximately 2 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C3 (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Granada. (174 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Granada. 2012 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Granada has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Granada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Granada | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Granada | C3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1263 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 45 L |