1989 Ford Meteor vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1989 Ford Meteor is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Meteor.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Meteor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Meteor | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Meteor | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2210 mm |
