1989 Ford Meteor vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Meteor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Meteor would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1989 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Meteor.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Meteor. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Meteor has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Meteor will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Meteor | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Meteor | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
