1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota ES 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Ranger | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3530 mm |