1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Smart Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Ranger | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
| Make | Ford | Smart |
| Model | Ranger | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3430 mm |
