1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Ranger | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4440 mm |
