1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2004 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Ranger | 2004 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | eK |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3400 mm |