1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Honda Civic
To start off, 2006 Honda Civic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Civic (113 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Ranger | 2006 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Ranger | Civic |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1802 cc |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4490 mm |
