1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Ranger | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3880 mm |