1989 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. Both 1989 Ford Ranger and 2010 Mazda CX-7 are equipped with a 2,300 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Ranger | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4681 mm |