1989 Ford RS 200 vs. 1996 Isuzu Amigo
To start off, 1996 Isuzu Amigo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Isuzu Amigo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Because 1996 Isuzu Amigo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 1989 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford RS 200 | 1996 Isuzu Amigo | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | RS 200 | Amigo |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 131 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2340 mm |