1989 Ford RS 200 vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 353 kg more than 1989 Ford RS 200.
Because 1989 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford RS 200 | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | RS 200 | 75 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.7 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 229 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 65 L |