1989 Ford RS 200 vs. 2011 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2011 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford RS 200 (247 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2011 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2011 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford RS 200 | 2011 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | RS 200 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1989 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1804 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 65 L |