1989 Ford Sierra vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1989 Ford Sierra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1989 Ford Sierra. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1111 kg more than 1989 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Ford Sierra | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Sierra | Continental |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2933 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 90 L |
