1989 Ford Sierra vs. 1999 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1999 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 472 more horse power than 1989 Ford Sierra. (101 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Sierra weights approximately 96 kg more than 1999 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (390 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Sierra. (153 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Sierra | 1999 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Sierra | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3504 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 390 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1146 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |