1989 Ford Sierra vs. 2009 Hyundai Getz
To start off, 2009 Hyundai Getz is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Sierra (125 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Hyundai Getz. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 2009 Hyundai Getz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Sierra weights approximately 28 kg more than 2009 Hyundai Getz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Ford Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Getz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Sierra (174 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hyundai Getz. (126 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hyundai Getz.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Sierra | 2009 Hyundai Getz | |
Make | Ford | Hyundai |
Model | Sierra | Getz |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1128 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |