1989 Ford Sierra vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Ford Sierra. (125 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Sierra.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Ford Sierra. (174 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Sierra | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3010 mm |