1989 Ford Taurus vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (91 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1989 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Taurus weights approximately 495 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Taurus (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Taurus | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 1990 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |