1989 Ford Taurus vs. 2006 Nissan Lafesta
To start off, 2006 Nissan Lafesta is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Taurus would be higher.
Because 2006 Nissan Lafesta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Lafesta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Taurus | 2006 Nissan Lafesta | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taurus | Lafesta |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |