1989 Ford Tempo vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1989 Ford Tempo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 150 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Tempo | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1989 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2980 mm |