1989 Ford Tempo vs. 1970 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1989 Ford Tempo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Tempo (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1970 Morris Oxford. (61 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1970 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Tempo weights approximately 20 kg more than 1970 Morris Oxford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 1970 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Ford | Morris |
Model | Tempo | Oxford |
Year Released | 1989 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |