1989 Ford Tempo vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1989 Ford Tempo. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1989 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Tempo (175 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Ford Tempo | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 626 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 157 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |